Keep in mind that everyone will have a different preference so our opinions may not align with your needs and ultimate favorite. You’ll find that most programs have all the features you’re looking for, so the ease-of-use factor is most strongly considered.

This is important for team collaboration when the engineer’s skills are scaled to larger, wide-spread applications.įinally, we consider the various feature sets and which programs are better for which applications. Stephan’s easiness metric, the software should be a standard and widely used platform in the industry.

When you have to click 5 times, move the mouse 5cm to the right and 4cm to the left to do a simple thing, and you have to do this simple thing one hundred times on your PCB. Why? Well because a good portion of the time you spend routing your PCB (time is money) is the time taken to perform simple actions. “A PCB routing software should be easy to use.To define that subjective criteria, I'd like to propose here a simple 'easiness measurement metric' defined as number of clicks + number of keystrokes + mouse moving distance to perform a given function. Cadence article to encompass our primary grading criteria: We really like this excerpt from Mathieu Stephan’s (AKA limpkin) excellent Altium vs. We also have biases for software that we’re extremely comfortable with compared to programs that we have had very little work with. It’s important to establish the criteria we’re using - which is, inevitably, subjective. This guide is structured to help you decide which is optimal or explore alternatives. Ultimately, your needs and preferences should drive what CAD program you use. They range from free or inexpensive to high-end/premium.Īll of the tools are different and unique in their own way. There are several programs available that range from simple and intuitive to highly sophisticated.

Altium osx